ESSAY
TITLE
Fostering National Development In
Uganda Through Youth Migration
AN
ESSAY WRITTEN FOR THE
INTERNATIONAL
ESSAY COMPETITION, 2011
OF
THE
WORLD
BANK
BY
BAKAMPA BRIAN BARYAGUMA
............................................................................................
Fostering National Development In Uganda Through Youth Migration
Summary
This
essay addresses the issue of youth migration in Uganda, tackling its
opportunities, challenges and implications. It is well researched, written and
enriched with experiences of the author, other community members and the
country at large.
In
introduction, the essay notes that migration is a dimension of human freedom by
which people choose the places of their choice in which to live and work.
The
opportunities are namely, increased incomes and lifting livelihoods, improved
health care, access to education, enhancement of empowerment, civic rights and
participation, and security.
To
broaden them in a manner that benefits youth migrants, it is necessary to ease
regular movement channels, respect migrants’ fundamental rights, reduce costs
of movement, improve outcomes for migrants and destination communities, enable
benefits from internal mobility, and include migration into development
strategies.
The
challenges are namely, the on-going financial crisis, data limitations, high
transport costs, poverty, conflicts and migration-related crimes, policy
barriers, corruption, and misconception of the consequences of migration.
The
implications are multi-faceted namely, improvement of household level impacts,
generation of mosaic societies, community and national benefits, social and
cultural implications, boosting aggregate economic growth, rapid urban growth,
and fiscal impact.
In
conclusion, I believe that the highly positive implications of youth migration
suggest the possibility of increasing migrants’ economic and social
contributions through policy measures and actions that broaden the benefits of
movement.
The
way forward is changing the negative nature of public debate through concerted
leadership and action.
...................................................................................
Fostering National Development In Uganda Through
Youth Migration
1.
Introduction
… At that time it was for the most part not very difficult to find work, because I had to seek work not as a skilled tradesman but as a so-called extra-hand ready to take any job that turned up by chance, just for the sake of earning my daily bread.Thus I found myself in the same situation as all those emigrants who shake the dust of Europe from their feet, with the cast-iron determination to lay the foundations of a new existence in the New World and acquire for themselves a new home. Liberated from all the paralyzing prejudices of class and calling, environment and tradition, they enter any service that opens its doors to them, accepting any work that comes their way, filled more and more with the idea that honest work never disgraced anybody, no matter what kind it may be. And so I was resolved to set both feet in what was for me a new world and push forward on my own road.I soon found out that there was some kind of work always to be got, but I also learned that it could just as quickly and easily be lost. The uncertainty of being able to earn a regular daily livelihood soon appeared to me as the gloomiest feature in this new life that I had entered.………….Among these emigrants I include not merely those who emigrate to America, but also the servant boy in the country who decides to leave his native village and migrate to the big city where he will be a stranger. He is ready to take the risk of an uncertain fate. In most cases he comes to town with a little money in his pocket and for the first few days he is not discouraged if he should not have the good fortune to find work. But if he finds a job and then loses it in a little while, the case is much worse....[1]
The
Human Development Report, 2009 stated that, “A person’s opportunities to lead a
long and healthy life, to have access to education, health care and material
goods, to enjoy political freedoms and to be protected from violence are all
strongly influenced by where they live.[2]” From the foregoing
passage, this was true 72 years ago like it is now.
Societies
(including Uganda) always considered migration to be a dimension of human freedom
by which people choose the places of their choice in which to live and work. Unsurprisingly
therefore, according to Dharam Ghai, “migration has been a constant in human
history” for the last 50,000 years[3].
Box
1.1 contains definitions of key words used in this essay.


As
a place of origin, Uganda experiences different forms of youth migration, occurring
for various reasons, including political instabilities and the search for
better economic prospects. Currently, thousands of Karimojong are migrating to
neighbouring towns[6]; several
Bakiga leave the densely populated
Kigezi region in South Western Uganda and settle mainly in the Bunyoro
sub-region; thousands of young people (locally called nkuba’kyeyos––literally, emigrants) head for greener pastures in Europe,
Asia and America; Iraq and Afghanistan are other key destination points, following
the 2003 U.S. invasion.
As a destination
point, the colonial period ushered in Indo-Asian immigrants who came as
labourers on the railway line under British construction[7];
Uganda is home to thousands of refugees mainly from neighbouring Rwanda,
Somalia, Southern Sudan and recently Kenya, who fled conflicts[8]––although
some came purely for socio-economic reasons.
Therefore,
migration has been part and parcel of Uganda’s national development.
2 Opportunities of youth migration.
Several motivational
factors are responsible for youth migration in Uganda. Most migrants are pushed
to their destination areas because of insufficient services in their home
areas. It is the opportunities available in other areas that attract young
people. This section considers some of these opportunities, how to broaden them
and the ad hoc actions expected of Uganda and other destination countries.
2.1 Prospects of mobility.
The World Bank
notes that, “many youth look for better opportunities by migrating” and that
this is unavoidable and desirable[9].
This reflects the fact that mobility is not only a natural part of human
history but a continuing dimension of development in which people endeavour to connect
to emerging opportunities and in so doing, change their circumstances.
2.1.1 Increased incomes and lifting livelihoods.
Higher incomes
boost purchasing power leading to increased consumption. This has a
trickle-down effect on other sectors of the economy like enhancing trade and
investment thus creating employment opportunities for more people. Along this
usually comes a more pleasant working environment. Better economic
opportunities result in enhanced livelihoods and quality of life.
2.1.2 Improved health care.
Moving to more
developed areas improves access to better health facilities and other
health-enhancing services like hygiene, better health information as well as professional
attendants[10]. In
Uganda, while 44% of the rural population reported illnesses, 38% of the urban
areas did––meaning that there are more chances of survival in developed areas[11].
2.1.3 Access to education.
This is ranked among
the most important reasons for youth migration[12].
Migration enhances educational attainment and standards by providing the
language, technical and social skills that facilitate economic and social
integration. Education has both intrinsic value and brings instrumental gains
in income-earning potential and social participation. Availability of teachers
and schools, good quality infrastructure, affordable transport costs and
anticipated higher incomes are all attributes of better education services and
facilities[13].
2.1.4 Enhancement of empowerment, civic rights and
participation.
Empowerment
enables youth to act freely in pursuit of their personal goals and wellbeing.
Migration facilitates this by separating them from elders and leading them to
take paid work outside their restrictive home environment. Moving potentially
affects not only a person’s material wellbeing but also other things like
bargaining power, self respect and dignity[14].
This benefits both girls and boys––the former by equipping them with skills to
overcome inimical traditional roles, the latter by empowering them to challenge
patriarchal structures within their families.
If any efforts
to empower youth are to be complete, there should be political and civic
guarantees ensuring their participation and civic engagement. The UNDP’s World
Values Survey suggested that people with a migrant background are more likely
to participate in a range of civic associations[15].
For a migrant, political participation increases with the ability to speak the
host region or country’s language, with duration of stay, education in that
area, connections to social networks and labour markets among others.
2.1.5 Security.
By the end of
2008, Uganda was home to 869,000 internally displaced persons[16].
She is also home to hundreds of thousands of refugees from volatile East
African Countries, Somalia and Southern Sudan.

Further, research indicates that education and
health indicators in refugee camps are superior to those of surrounding local
populations. By 2007, the gross primary school enrolment ratio of refugees was
better than that of local Ugandans[18].
Similarly, the share of births attended by skilled medical personnel in camps was
significantly higher than the national population[19].
2.2 Broadening opportunities for young migrants.
This sub-section
recommends actions that will allow migration to contribute fully to broadening
opportunities for young migrants, with the overall objective of enhancing their freedoms and development outcomes rather than controlling or
restricting their movement, especially now when the world is slowly
getting over the financial crisis.
2.2.1 Easing regular movement channels.
Unnecessary,
overly restrictive and somewhat prohibitive legal and administrative barriers
to movement should be eased off by liberalizing and simplifying the regular
channels of movement. On top of often landing migrants into irregular settlement,
they create uncertainty, frustration and expose them to double risks i.e.
suffering unemployment, insecurity and social marginalization, yet at the same
time often portraying them as the source of these problems[20].
More unskilled
youth should be allowed[21]
by expanding the number of their visas and promoting seasonal employment
opportunities in ‘shortage occupations’ like agriculture. Topical issues like
granting extension and permanence, employer portability, setting annual inflow
rates in a manner responsive to local conditions and permitting migrants to leave
and return to the host country should be addressed positively.
2.2.2 Respecting migrants’ fundamental rights.
Any proceedings
against migrants (administrative and judicial) should be treated according to
basic norms of respect, following the rule of law. All employees irrespective
of origin deserve a suitable working environment, guaranteeing minimum
standards like provision of basic health and safety protection. Alongside other
fundamental human rights like liberty[22],
security of person[23]
and protection against forced labour[24]
should exist basic migrant rights like the right to equal pay for equal work[25],
right to join trade unions[26],
protection against arbitrary detention[27]
and having a fair hearing[28].
Countries of origin like Uganda can provide support to their young emigrants by
establishing resource centres to offer advice about migrants’ rights and
responsibilities and availing pre-departure orientation about what to expect
abroad[29].
2.2.3 Reducing costs of movement.
Moving is a
costly venture characterized by exorbitant and regressive fees whose costs are
inflated by corruption, migrants’ inadequate information coupled with unequal
bargaining power and middlemen charges. Costs can be reduced by:-
- Allowing free movement of labour. For example, the East African Common Market Protocol that came into force on 1st July, 2010, allows East African citizens to move freely within the region.
- Reducing the cost of and easing access to official travel documents like passports.
- Empowering migrants through access to information and strong social networks. This does away with middlemen and bridges the information gaps between migrant workers and potential employers, thereby enhancing migrants’ bargaining power.
- Regulating private recruitment agencies to prevent abuses and frauds. Recruiters and employers should be considered to be ‘co-employers’ and so undertake joint liability.
- Governments on their own volition may have to take over the direct administration of recruitment instead of leaving all recruitment to private players.
2.2.4 Improving outcomes for migrants and
destination communities.
Inclusion and integration arrangements are important
for both individual migrants and host communities, making it necessary to recognize
the costs of immigration at the community level and planning for the presence
of migrants so that destination communities are not unduly inconvenienced. The influx
of migrants could adversely affect certain people in destination areas, more so
those with specific skills. Particularly, the following should be done:-
- Providing access to basic services like education and health care, to both migrants and locals equitably. In Uganda, migrants and non-migrants have access to free immunization services.
- Training migrants in local languages because it facilitates easy and quick inclusion and enhancing employability.
- Allowing people to work since ability to find work increases the chances of social inclusion and brings with it economic gains like salaries and wages. Working permits do not exist in Uganda.
- Supporting local government roles as migrants interact with local officials on a day-to-day basis. They should be supported by strengthening them and their affairs closely monitored. The actions of local officials and chiefs matter if social services are to be equitably accessible to all.
- Addressing discrimination and xenophobia, considering that engendering tolerance and protecting diversity at the community level is extremely important especially where there is a risk of violence. See Box 2.2.

In terms of the
number of people who move, internal migration far exceeds external migration[30].
Government programmes should facilitate internal migration processes.
Accordingly, policies like removing the legal and administrative barriers to
internal mobility, providing necessary support to migrants while at their
destination areas in partnership with local communities, allocating more money
to key local destination areas and building local government capacity to
respond to people’s needs could be designed and implemented.
2.2.6 Mainstreaming migration into development strategies.
Migration issues
should be integrated into the design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation
stages of development strategies[31].
Migration can be helpful for households and families interested in diversifying
and improving their livelihoods. Money flows especially in the form of
remittances can improve well-being, stimulate economic growth and alleviate
poverty.
3 Challenges of youth migration.
Several barriers
hamper youth migration in Uganda, notwithstanding that migration is consistent
with the idea that more often than not, people move in search of better
opportunities. This is partly due to the fact that migration is a very
contentious issue. This section examines some of the barriers.
3.1 The on-going financial crisis.
The financial
crisis has become a jobs crisis that is synonymous with companies closing and
laying off workers en masse. For example, in 2008, G TV closed its branches in
Uganda forcing hundreds of youth into unemployment, especially those
broadcasting the English Premier League and other European football tournaments
in their local video halls. At the international level, major destination
countries like the United States lost about six million jobs between December
2007 and May 2009[32]!
In such scenarios, migrants are most affected because they are more vulnerable
to recessions[33]
and so are laid off first. In 2009, I was privileged to interact with a certain
young man whose dream of obtaining a U.K. scholarship was shattered by the
financial crisis: he was full of misery and sorrow. He hoped to find employment
as he studied, but this dream was suddenly rendered unachievable.
3.2 Data limitations.
Severe data
limitations obscure the magnitude and gravity of the migration debate. Youth
migration data remains weak, patchy, non-comparable and hardly accessible[34]
hence making it very difficult to viably plan for migrants’ well-being vis-a-vis
the receiving community’s readiness to absorb them and to integrate migration
into national development strategies as earlier advocated.
3.3 High transport costs.
Moving is very
costly––the longer the distance, the higher the cost. Proximity between the
source and destination region or country is a big challenge. More often than
not, only the skilled, well-to-do and probably the very high risk takers are
able to move. This excludes an overwhelming majority who would have also loved
to migrate to other areas of opportunity. Therefore, the paradox that despite the
fact that people moving out of poor countries have the most to gain from
moving, yet they are the least mobile[35]
is not surprising. The solution lies in reduction of the transaction costs of
movement. Box 3.1 reveals my expensive travel experience.

3.4 Poverty.
The acute poverty levels prevailing in many
households prevent many youth from moving as people are more likely to migrate only
when they have the financial resources to do so. Lack of resources impairs the
poor, depriving them of the means to move. Many Ugandan youth are unable to
migrate from rural to urban areas like Kampala city because they cannot afford
transport costs.
3.5 Conflicts and migration-related crimes.
Conflicts and
criminality have a direct adverse impact on migrants especially in conditions
of restricted choice by exposing movers to the worst human development outcomes
including slavery and homelessness. Consequently, they tend to discourage
potential migrants from moving to better areas. This is common in situations of
clandestine criminal activity like human trafficking.
3.6 Policy barriers.
Since very few
people migrate from developed to developing countries, policy barriers[36]
operate in disfavor of youth hailing from developing countries like Uganda. This
is because developed countries are not under pressure to open movement channels
and admit migrants from developing countries[37].
Hence during the Doha Round, it emerged that actually the two blocks have
conflicting interests regarding the issue of migration––while developing countries
want to liberalize the movement of natural persons, the industrially developed
ones want trade in services.
3.7 Corruption.
Corruption
impedes youth migration by inflating the charges of getting the required international
travel documents like passports. It causes excessive and unnecessary delays if
one is unable to bribe their way out just because the concerned officers
deliberately ignore applicants in order to force them into paying. This unnecessarily
aggravates the costs of migrating. See Box 3.1.
3.8 Misconception of the consequences of migration.
There is a
popular misconception that immigrants have a negative impact on the economy or
that they compromise security. The presence of immigrants is associated with
the erosion of public order and the rule of law. This is why in May, 2008 South
Africans attacked foreign immigrants especially Zimbabweans, accusing them of
taking their jobs.
Public
information and awareness-raising campaigns to provide people with impartial
information and analysis on the scale, scope and consequences of migration is
important. It is only then that people can make objective opinions and attain
factual understanding of the issues at hand.
4 Implications of youth migration.
The implications
of youth migration in Uganda are diverse, affecting different categories of
people differently. Its impacts are multi-faceted––both from the perspective of
Uganda as an origin and destination state. Like UNICEF noted, migration can be
both a liability and an opportunity for development[38].
It is from the overall outcomes of the “liability” and “opportunity” elements
that its complex, context-specific and fluid impacts or implications are
determined.
4.1 Impact on Uganda as a place of origin.
Many young
Ugandans leave the country on a daily basis in search of greener pastures
abroad and their departure means a lot to our country. Much as migration is
perceived to be a curse to developing countries, this essay generally adopts an
optimistic attitude to the matter. Nevertheless, negative perceptions are given
due consideration.
4.1.1 Household level impacts.
Through
financial remittances, migration improves the migrant’s prospects and that of
other family members which are used to finance family investments and immediate
consumption needs. Remittances have played a key role in the survival of many
war-affected Ugandan communities especially Northern Uganda. See Box 2.1.
However,
migration can be painful involving high emotional costs for the affected families,
responsible for the collapse of the traditional safety net between sending and
receiving families[39].
Unlike in the past when youth migrated to work for people with whom their
families had pre-established relations, changed economic situations mean that many
youth often work for total strangers nowadays[40].
4.1.2 Generation of mosaic societies.
A great
diversity of ethnic groups living amidst indigenous majorities has generated a
mosaic texture of societies, affecting their ethnic and cultural diversity and
basically changing their composition[41].
A country like the United States has been positively impacted upon by migration
and derives much of its prosperity from the cosmopolitan nature of its population
of 250 million.
4.1.3 Community and national benefits.
Political
transformations[42],
liberalization of community norms[43]
and promotion of entrepreneurial skills are in many respects positive products
of migration. For instance, the nkuba’kyeyos
(emigrant youth workers) not only invest in productive activities but also
transfer technology, repatriate enhanced skills and exposure to better working
and management practices.
The traditional
fear that the departure of able-bodied youth causes labour scarcity and out-put
depreciations is countered by the fact that the remittances they send back home
are an important source of rural investment finance[44].
4.1.4 Social and cultural implications.
Social
remittances[45]
are responsible for changes in traditional, caste-like forms of hereditary
inequality based on trivial considerations like kinship, skin colour and
religion which impede equitable development of inferior status ethnicities. The
Batwa community is a good example
whose gradual access to higher incomes and education has changed their social
standing. Migrants also enrich the social fabric of their adopted homes as
evidenced by the impact of the Bakiga
community in Bunyoro region.
But migration
could be recipe for violence in the host community as discussed in Box 4.1. Further,
it is likely to spark a ‘culture of migration’ in which movement is associated
with personal, social and material success while staying put smacks of
underdevelopment and failure.

4.2 Impact on Uganda as a destination point.
Uganda is home
to thousands of refugees from volatile neighbouring East African countries as
well as Somalia and Southern Sudan. Better still, Uganda hosts several students
from around the region who come in search of better quality University education
than is available in their home countries. Therefore, like any other
destination point, Uganda is also impacted upon by youth migration.
4.2.1 Boosting aggregate economic growth.
Migration spurs
aggregate economic growth because it encourages innovation and specialization,
thereby stimulating local investments and employment. It is not surprising therefore,
that U.S President Barack Obama, in his 2011 State of the Union Address,
promised to make immigration an important issue, especially by protecting young
and brilliant immigrant students from deportation.
4.2.2 Rapid urban growth.
The flow of
people to cities causes the concentration of ideas, talent and capital leading
to positive spillovers like increased investment and employment; this may
occasion severe strain on local services and amenities though.
4.2.3 Fiscal impact.
The question is
whether or not migrants take more than they receive. When migrants accept
loathed work like child care, they facilitate the entry of highly skilled women
into the labour force––yet both pay taxes. When migrants’ skills complement
those of locals, then both stand to benefit. In such situations, it is
untenable to say that migrants take more than they receive by imposing tax
burdens on the local population.
5 Conclusion
and the way forward.
5.1 Conclusion.
What emerged is
that youth migration is a concept of human development, encompassing people’s
expansion of their freedom to live their lives as they choose and that mobility
is a human freedom, exercisable through movement.
If migration is
to truly make youth feel that they have freedom and choice over their lives,
the public policies and actions they encounter during movement should be
designed to this end. Better still, although migration has the potential to
enhance human development, it pays a lot to extend the provision of services
and infrastructure to places of origin. This provides opportunities for people
to develop productive skills and to compete for jobs locally, while at the same
time preparing them for jobs elsewhere if they choose to move.
Migration largely
affects young people’s desire to improve their livelihoods, yet this is
constrained by policy and economic barriers. Amidst these challenges, it is not
yet clear whether the financial crisis will either count in favour or against
migration. The highly positive implications of youth migration for both origin
and host communities suggest the possibility of increasing migrants’ economic
and social contributions through policy measures and actions that enhance and
broaden the benefits of movement.
5.2 The Way forward: benefits vis-à-vis risks.
The Human Development
Report, 2009 found that demographic trends favour relaxing the barriers to
migrants’ entry[46];
the growing labour abundance of developing countries suggests entry into a
period when increased migration to developed countries will benefit individual migrants,
their families and will also be increasingly advantageous for the populations
of destination countries[47];
and that fears about migrants are generally exaggerated[48].
The benefits (also
opportunities) of migrating outweigh the risks (also challenges) involved. Changing
the negative nature of public debate through concerted leadership and action is
the way forward to fostering national development in Uganda through youth
migration. Only then can we win the future––as Bobby Kennedy said, “The future
is not a gift. It is an achievement.” Hope and inspiration may be found in the belief
that in the face of impossible odds, people who love their country can change
it.
Notes and References
[1]
Adolf Hitler, MEIN KAMPF,
as translated by James Murphy, February, 1939, pp. 28 & 29.
[2] United Nations Development
Programme, HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT 2009––Overcoming barriers: Human mobility
and development, New York, U.S.A, p. 9.
[3] Dharam Ghai, “Migration, Diaspora
and Development”, a paper presented at Imperial Royale Hotel, Kampala, 9th-05-2008,
at p. 1. Mr. Ghai is a former Director, United Nations Research Institute for
Social Development and of the World Employment Programme Research, ILO.
[4] Human Development Report, 2009,
op. cit. at p. 21.
[5] World Youth Report 2005; Young
people today and in 2015, p. 16.
[6] Elizabeth Stites, Dyan Mazurana
and Darlington Akabwai, “Out-migration, Return, and Resettlement in Karamoja,
Uganda: The case of Kobulin, Bokora County”, June 2007 at pp. 6-14.
[7] When late President Idi Amin took
power in 1971, he expelled all Asians from Uganda in 1972, during his economic
war accusing them of “exploiting and milking Uganda dry”. Many of them returned
after 1986 when President Yoweri Kaguta Museveni and his National Resistance
Movement/Army came to power.
[8] Many refugees have since been
assimilated into Ugandan society and cultures. For example, the 3rd
Schedule of the 1995 Uganda Constitution recognizes “Banyarwanda” as being part
of Uganda’s indigenous communities as at 1st February, 1926.
[9] The World Bank, AFRICA
DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS 2008/09: Youth and Employment in Africa––The Potential,
the Problem, the Promise, Washington, D.C. 20433, U.S.A, December, 2008, at p.
1.
[10] The effect of exposure to better
information is seen in the fact that emigrants tend to have fewer and more
nourished children than non-migrants.
[11] Uganda Bureau of Statistics,
UGANDA NATIONAL HOUSEHOLD SURVEY 2009/2010, Kampala, Uganda, at p. 20.
[12] The World Bank, op. cit. at p.
18.
[13] Uganda hosts several students
from around East Africa who come to get good quality university education. One
university called Kampala International University has been nicknamed “Kenya In
Uganda” for its dominant Kenyan students population.
[14] Human Development Report, 2009,
op. cit. at p. 60.
[15] ibid, at p. 61.
[16] ibid, at p. 63. Most of these
are victims of the civil war between the Lord’s Resistance Army and the
Government of Uganda.
[17] Elizabeth Stites et al, op. cit.
at p. 16. This may be short lived though as men resume these roles upon return.
[18] Human Development Report 2009,
op. cit. at p. 64.
[19] ibid. The probable explanation
for this is that aid agencies find a lot more interest in refugees than locals.
[20] ibid, at p. 95.
[21] This is because they are the
ones most affected by movement barriers. A disproportionate number of migrants moving
from poor to rich areas consist of persons with professional and technical
qualifications. For example, notwithstanding that Uganda’s health centres seriously
need medical personnel Uganda has ‘lost’ many of its doctors and nurses to rich
countries like the U.K. and U.S.A.
[22] Universal Declaration of Human
Rights, Article 3.
[23] ibid.
[24] ibid., Article 23(1).
[25] International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant
Workers and Members of Their Families, Art. 25(a).
[26] ibid., Article 26.
[27] ibid., Article 16(1).
[28] ibid., Article
18.
[29] See, Dharam Ghai, op. cit. at p.
4.
[30] Human Development Report 2009,
op. cit. at p. 106.
[31] IOM Policy Brief, “Migration and
the Millennium Development Goals”, September, 2010, p. 3.
[32] Human Development Report 2009, op.
cit. at p. 41.
[33] For reasons that usually they
are younger, have less formal education, are insufficiently experienced and
tend to work as temporary labourers. See, Human Development Report 2009, at p. 41.
[34] The 2009 Human Development Report
sarcastically notes that, “It is much easier for policy makers to count the
international movements of shoes and cell phones than of nurses and
construction workers.” at p. 28.
[35] Human Development Report 2009, op.
cit. at p. 24.
[36] In exercise of
their sovereignty and territorial integrity, many destination countries have
increased policy barriers to movement. Most regimes tend to favour high-skilled
youth against their low-skilled counterparts. In most cases, this is in
response to public opinion which tends to favour greater restrictions on
immigration, for instance India.
[37] A paltry 3% of international
migrants move from developed to developing countries. See, the Human
Development Report 2009, op. cit. at p. 21.
[38] UNICEF, “Children, Youth and
Migration”, at p. 31.
[39] Elizabeth Stites et al, op. cit.
at p. 9.
[40] ibid.
[41] Dharam Ghai, op. cit. at p. 2.
[42] The Uganda North American
Association is a relevant example. It has contributed to the improvement of
political institutions in Uganda by acting as agents of political and social
change, banking on new values, expectations and ideas influenced by their
experiences mainly in Canada and U.S.A.
[43] There is a popular belief among
Ugandan women that migrant men are more loving and caring than their
non-migrant counterparts.
[44] However, the 2009 Human
Development Report warns that remittance-led development is not a suitable
growth strategy. See p. 79.
[45] These include ideas, practices,
identities and social capital that flow back to families and communities at places
of origin.
[46] Human Development Report, 2009,
op. cit. at p. 44.
[47] ibid.
[48] ibid., at p. 92.
No comments:
Post a Comment