Tuesday, 9 August 2022

Considerations a Researcher Should Put in Place while Selecting Appropriate Methodology

By Bakampa Brian Baryaguma

[Dip. Law (First Class)–LDC; Cert. Oil & Gas–Mak; LLB (Hons)–Mak]

bakampasenior@gmail.com; www.huntedthinker.blogspot.ug

August 2022

1.                  Introduction

According to Gradireland, a social researcher is a person who, “Designs, manages and undertakes research projects that aim to investigate social issues such as employment, unemployment, gender, health, education and social policy.”[1] Denis Asiimwe Katebire avers that the purpose of a social researcher is to explore, describe or analyse social phenomena or events.[2] From Katebire’s averment, it can be deduced that a social researcher is a person who explores, describes or analyses social phenomena or events.

The term methodology is fairly easy to understand, but not easy to define. According to Denis Asiimwe Katebire, “Research methodology [i]s an attempt by scholars and researchers to validate the rationale behind the selected research design and provide justification of why it is appropriate in solving the selected research problem. Generally, in a methodology there is an overall philosophical approach to the problem.”[3] For their part, J. W. Buckley, M. H. Buckley and H. Chiang define research methodology as, "the strategy or architectural design by which the researcher maps out an approach to problem-finding or problem-solving."[4] Alternatively, PhD Monster states that, “Research methodology is a scientific and logical technique that helps you decide on an appropriate research method to collect data.”[5] I deduce from these definitions that methodology is a systematic plan for scientifically and logically addressing a research matter or problem.

The methodology section in a research paper, thesis or dissertation comprises the following:

(i)                 Research design – describes the nature and pattern the research intends to follow;

(ii)               Research approaches – qualitative vis-à-vis quantitative;

(iii)             Description of geographical area and population of study;

(iv)             Description of population to be sampled;

(v)               Sampling strategies used in selecting representative elements or population subjects;

(vi)             Data collection methods, including instruments and procedures to be used;

(vii)           Data quality control i.e. reliability and validity of instruments used in data collection;

(viii)         Measurements i.e. formulae or scales in the study; and

(ix)             Data analysis, involving organization and interpretation of data generated.[6]

2.                  Considerations for Selecting Appropriate Methodology

There is nothing like methodology in the abstract. Methodology applies in a given setting where some preconditions must exist. As such therefore, selecting an appropriate methodology is premised on many underlying considerations that a researcher must put in place. The following are the notable ones.

1.                  Concept

The first thing is to have a concept. A concept is an idea that one is interested in. If the researcher’s idea is to determine the relationship of one thing to another, then he would need to use quantitative methodology that can help him collect statistical data, with which to make clear numerical descriptions or inferences. On the other hand, if the researcher’s idea is to explore things like characteristics, reasons, opinions, perceptions and motivations, then the qualitative research methodology is ideal because these cannot be easily statistically quantified,[7] but can best be easily stated verbally or non-numerically.

2.                  Variables

A variable is a non-constant object of enquiry.[8] Like the name suggests, it is something that varies – as opposed to something that is deemed, within a research setting, to be fixed and unchanging.[9] It is a characteristic of a person, object or phenomenon, which can take on different values.[10]

Variables can be numerical or quantitative, for example age, distance, weight, income, etc.[11] They can also be categorical i.e. can be expressed in terms of categories, for example colour of eyes, blood group, sex, staple food of a locality,[12] political party affiliation, etc.

If a researcher is dealing with numerical or quantitative variables, he will use quantitative methodology that enables statistical analysis of phenomena and expression of findings. But if the researcher is handling categorical variables, he will need qualitative methodology that can be used to for instance verbally describe the nature of population sampled.

3.                  Hypotheses and Research Questions

Research is always a targeted endeavour, focusing on specific matters of interest to the researcher and therefore interested in specific answers to those matters. Being, “… starting point, clear assumptions about the likely relationships between the variables to be studied, or … clear questions about such relationships,”[13] hypotheses and research questions determine the kind of data needed to verify or answer those assumptions and questions.[14]

(a)                Hypotheses

According to Denis Asiimwe Katebire, “A hypothesis is a tentative assumption made in order to draw out and test its logical and empirical consequences. It is a proposition that is stated in testable form and predicts a particular relationship or lack of it between two or more variables. … it must be a statement of fact and susceptible to empirical investigation.”[15] Therefore a hypothesis is a statement of expectation or prediction that will be tested by research. It expresses expectation of or predicts the relationship between variables.

There are two kinds of hypotheses: statistical hypothesis / null hypothesis, which is a statement claiming or predicting equality between the variables under study;[16] and a research hypothesis / alternative hypothesis, which is a statement of inequality between the variables under study.[17]

Katebire avers that, “Hypotheses are a feature of quantitative studies which require statistical tests to prove or refute them, although research hypotheses are also used in qualitative studies.”[18] It follows from this that where a researcher assumes some things by way of hypotheses, he necessarily involves quantitative methodology to experimentally or statistically prove or disprove the existence, accuracy or otherwise of the things assumed at the commencement of the study. But where research hypotheses are concerned, the researcher uses qualitative methodology to explore or discover the reality of things assumed.

(b)               Research Questions

In simple terms, a research question is a question that a research study sets out to answer.[19] It is a concise interrogative statement, normally stated in the present simple tense.[20] Research questions normally focus on what variables are to be described and what relationship might exist among them.[21]

A research question determines the methodology to use depending on how it is crafted. If it is a how or why format, then qualitative methodology will be used[22] because how or why questions tend to be open-ended, providing direct quotations and make the researcher an integral part of the study,[23] thus being best achieved in an explorative manner: a key element of qualitative research.[24] If however, the research question is crafted in a where or when format, then quantitative methodology will be used in the study[25] because where and when require objective methods that attempt to remove the investigator from the investigation, which can best be achieved in a quantitative approach.[26] But if a research question is coined in what fashion, then mixed research[27] methodology will be used because answering the what will most likely require a blend of both verbal descriptions (qualitative) and numerical analysis (quantitative), since both techniques will be mixed in a single study.

4.                  Frame of Reference

A reference is something turned to or gone to for information, guidance, etc. Thus, a frame of reference informs, guides or shapes a research study. This is a framework within which to conduct a research study.[28] More technically, “A frame of reference is a theoretical analysis or abstract conceptualization that places the study within a context of meaningful reference.”[29] The American Psychological Association defines the term frame of reference in psychology terms, but their definition can be helpful in helping us understand it. They say that a frame of reference, “in social psychology, [is] the set of assumptions or criteria by which a person or group judges ideas, actions, and experiences.”[30] From this definition we may infer that in social research, frame of reference is a set of assumptions or criteria by which a researcher judges social phenomena or events.

The framework (whether theoretical or conceptual) comprises concepts or variables, their relationship to one another and a basic theory explaining them.[31] A frame of reference is very important because it determines the methodology to use during research in two main ways:

(a)                on basis of concepts and variables – if the framework identifies comparative ones in the sense of determining relationships, then quantitative methodologies will be used; but if the concepts and variables are exploratory, inquiring into new phenomena and events, then qualitative methodologies are to be used; and

(b)               on theoretical or conceptual basis – if there is a dominant theory that explains the state of things as are presently, then that theory should be interrogated more for veracity and accuracy which requires qualitative methodologies; but if there are different explanations for various perceptions of or ideas about the subject of study, then quantitative methodology would be ideal to explain or predict the more authentic one.

5.                  Appropriate Data Collection Instruments

A data collection instrument is a tool used to collect research data. Using appropriate tools is crucial because, “Accurate and systematic data collection is critical to conducting scientific [and social] research.”[32] Examples of data collection instruments are questionnaires, interviews, observations, experiments and scales (including measuring and weighing tapes).[33]

Data collection instruments are appropriate if and when they produce valid and reliable results. The instruments chosen must possess certain qualities and standards so as to collect data that is acceptable as appropriate and authentic.[34] Appropriateness and authenticity are determined by the validity and reliability of the data collected,[35] which inevitably depends on the kind of data collection instrument used. This is how critical the data collection instrument is. And so, a researcher must ensure that the right tools are in place while selecting a methodology to use in the course of study. Interestingly, the instrument chosen to collect the data will also depend on the type of data planned on collecting (qualitative, quantitative or mixed) and how it is planned to collect it.[36] The most used data collection instruments are questionnaires, interviews and observations.[37]

(a)                Questionnaires

Invented by Sir Francis Galton, “A questionnaire is a data collection instrument consistent of a series of questions and other prompts for the purpose of gathering information from respondents.”[38] Questionnaires are best suited for quantitative methodology,[39] where data collected is objective (i.e. not subject to individual tastes and preferences) and is statistically significant representing a large sample of the population covered.[40]

But questionnaires are also ideal for mixed methodology, measuring both qualitative / subjective data and quantitative / objective data.[41] This usually happens in situations where respondents are asked to explain their previous choice, hence inviting inclusion of personal perceptions and attitudes in the study.

(b)               Interviews

Interviews are active interactions between two or more people leading to a negotiated contextually based result.[42] Data is collected by asking questions through listening to individuals, recording, filming their responses, or a combination of methods.[43] Interviews are popular as a data-collection tool because of their flexibility.[44] They can be structured or semi structured to generate insights and concepts.[45] It is important to hold interviews because they help the researcher understand other people’s constructions of reality in their terms and in a depth which addresses the rich context that is the substance of their meanings.[46]

Interviews are a tool mainly for the collection of qualitative data,[47] and so they are best suited for qualitative methodologies like probing, which enable collecting complex information with a higher proportion of opinion-based information.[48]

(c)                Observations

Observation is a systematic data-collecting technique that involves watching people or things in their natural environment or in a naturally occurring situation.[49] It can cover individuals, groups and whole communities.[50] The researcher cum observer can participate at different levels ranging from wholly participant to non-participant.[51] Data is collected through field notes, video or audio recordings.[52]

Observation is most suitable for qualitative methodologies which permit searching for patterns, themes and holistic features, in order to generate new hypotheses and theories grounded in the data collected.

But if observations are coded to exact numerical data, this instrument can be used in quantitative methodologies by summarizing the data and identifying statistical relationships.

3.                  Conclusion

Methodology is very vital for the success of a research activity or project. Selecting the appropriate methodology is dependent on many considerations as discussed above. A researcher should put those considerations in place at the start of the research study.

 

REFERENCES

[1] Gradireland, ‘Social researcher’ (2022). Accessed online at https://gradireland.com/careers-advice/job-descriptions/social-researcher, on 12 April 2022, at 16:01 GMT.

[2] Denis Asiimwe Katebire, Social Research Methodology: An Introduction (2007), at 15.

[3] Ibid., at 19.

[4] J. W. Buckley, M. H. Buckley and H. Chiang, Research Methodology & Business Decisions (1976). Accessed online at https://maaw.info/ArticleSummaries/ArtSumBuckley76.htm#:~:text=The%20authors%20define%20research%20methodology,six%20parts%20as%20indicated%20below., on 12 April 2022, at 12:47 GMT.

[5] PhD Monster, ‘Factors to Consider while Choosing the Right Research Methodology’ (2019). Accessed online at https://www.phdmonster.com/factors-to-consider-while-choosing-the-right-research-methodology/, on 9 April 2022, at 13:00 GMT.

[6] Makerere University, ‘Guidelines for the Format of Research Proposals, Research Reports, Thesis and Dissertations’ (2011), at 4.

[7] See Denis Asiimwe Katebire, supra note 2, at 9, for the difference between qualitative and quantitative research.

[8] Lee Harvey, ‘Social Research Glossary’ Quality Research International (2022). Accessed online at https://www.qualityresearchinternational.com/socialresearch/variable.htm#:~:text=The%20object%20of%20enquiry%2C%20treated,gender%20and%20party%20political%20preference., on 12 April 2022, at 18:06 GMT.

[9] Ibid.

[10] Denis Asiimwe Katebire, supra note 2, at 19.

[11] Ibid.

[12] Ibid.

[13] Ibid., at 26.

[14] Ibid.

[15] Ibid.

[16] Ibid.

[17] Ibid., at 27.

[18] Ibid.

[19] Wikipedia, ‘Research question’ (2022). Accessed online at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Research_question, on 13 April 2022, at 05:11 GMT.

[20] Denis Asiimwe Katebire, supra note 2, at 27.

[21] Ibid.

[22] Wikipedia, supra note 19.

[23] Denis Asiimwe Katebire, supra note 2, at 62.

[24] Ibid., at 15.

[25] Wikipedia, supra note 19.

[26] Denis Asiimwe Katebire, supra note 2, at 62.

[27] Ibid., at 8, defines mixed research as, “… that one in which quantitative and qualitative techniques are mixed in a single study.”

[28] Ibid., at 28.

[29] Ibid.

[30] American Psychological Association, APA Dictionary of Psychology (2022). Accessed online at https://dictionary.apa.org/frame-of-reference, on 13 April 2022, at 08:07 GMT.

[31] Denis Asiimwe Katebire, supra note 2, at 28.

[32] Dr. Karim Abawi, ‘Data Collection Instruments (Questionnaire & Interview)’ (2014), at 2. Accessed online at https://www.gfmer.ch/SRH-Course-2013/Geneva-Workshop/pdf/Data-collection-instruments-Abawi-2014.pdf, on 13 April 2022, at 12:00 GMT.

[33] Coventry University, ‘Data-collecting instruments: An overview of instruments to collect qualitative or quantitative data for analysis’ FutureLearn (2022). Accessed online at https://www.futurelearn.com/info/courses/research-construction-management/0/steps/75098, on 13 April 2022, at 08:40 GMT.

[34] Denis Asiimwe Katebire, supra note 2, at 29.

[35] Ibid.

[36] Coventry University, supra note 33.

[37] Ibid.

[38] Dr. Karim Abawi, supra note 32, at 3.

[39] Coventry University, supra note 33; Dr. Karim Abawi, supra note 32, at 10.

[40] Dr. Karim Abawi, supra note 32, at 10.

[41] Ibid.

[42] Coventry University, supra note 33.

[43] Dr. Karim Abawi, supra note 32, at 11.

[44] Coventry University, supra note 33.

[45] Ibid.

[46] Ibid.

[47] Ibid.

[48] Dr. Karim Abawi, supra note 32, at 13.

[49] Coventry University, supra note 33.

[50] Ibid.

[51] Ibid.

[52] Ibid.

Monday, 22 November 2021

Departure and/or Resignation from Ndejje Division Taxi Operators Myooga SACCO

NDEJJE DIVISION TAXI OPERATORS MYOOGA COOPERATIVE SAVINGS AND CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED

LOCATED AT MIRIMU CELL, NDEJJE WARD, NDEJJE DIVISION, MAKINDYE-SSABAGABO MUNICIPALITY, WAKISO DISTRICT, UGANDA.

TELEPHONE NO.: 0752427792, 0705397695, 0703520549

Friday, 19th November, 2021.

To:

The Town Clerk,

Makindye Ssabagabo Municipal Council,

Dear Sir / Madam,

Re: Departure and/or Resignation from Ndejje Division Taxi Operators Myooga SACCO

“Sensible people will see trouble coming and avoid it, but a foolish person will walk right into it and regret it later,” Proverbs 22:3.

Introduction

Greetings from our SACCO, Ndejje Division Taxi Operators Myooga Cooperative Savings And Credit Society Limited. Thank you for the good work you are doing for our beloved country, Uganda.

I am a member, immediate former Secretary of Loans Committee and current Secretary of Supervisory Committee of the above mentioned SACCO.

I am very grateful for this wonderful program of Emyooga. As an active member of the SACCO and by virtue of my roles and responsibilities there, I have witnessed first-hand how this program is enabling access to affordable capital by Ugandans and I see that it has great potential to better the fortunes of our people, making them prosperous and advanced, if it is well managed.

The purpose of this letter is to inform you and those copied herein that after careful consideration, I have decided to leave the SACCO, resign my leadership position from it and to bring to your attention the fact that our SACCO is poorly run due to gross internal leadership weaknesses and contradictions, but also unhealthy external influences, whose involvement in SACCO affairs fans conflicts and causes illegalities. The weaknesses, contradictions and unhealthy external influences manifest in various forms like corruption, profiteering, abuse of power and incompetence. I make this alarm to save my personal reputation, ensure my personal safety and invite appropriate external intervention to streamline the SACCO’s activities to save it from looming disaster, hence saving taxpayers’ money.

1.                  Corruption

The SACCO is led by utterly corrupt people. The signatories of its bank account are Mr. Bright Joseph (Chairperson), Ms. Mbabazi Annet (Treasurer) and Mr. Segawa Vicent (Secretary), who have so far taken out of the SACCO account shillings five hundred thousand (Ugx 500,000/=) and still expect to take more shillings five hundred thousand (Ugx 500,000/=), hence making a total of shillings one million (Ugx 1,000,000/=), which money is not spent on SACCO programs. They say that the money was (and will be) given to the Municipal Commercial Officer, Ms. Nassuuna Doreen, in appreciation for helping to set up the SACCO. Of recent there is another reason: that it is to induce her to write a favorable report so that the SACCO benefits from a promise of shillings twenty million (Shs. 20,000,000/=) to well performing SACCOs, allegedly made by Hon. Haruna Kasolo Kyeyune. I previously opposed this idea of bribery, warned our leaders against it and also cautioned Ms. Nassuuna against taking the money. Evidence of this can be seen in an email I sent to her on this matter, which is [quoted in] this letter for your perusal.

Hello, Madam Nassuuna Doreen. Good morning.

I hope you are well.

I come to you with career saving information in form of a warning to you and the RDC of Wakiso, cautioning you against asking and/or taking bribes from SaCCOs and their leaders in your area of operation.

Mr. Bright Joseph, the Chairperson of Ndejje Taxi Operators Myooga SaCCO, told us in our general meeting that you and the RDC asked the SaCCO to give you Uganda shillings one million (Ugx 1,000,000/=) from the SaCCO's seed capital. He added that he has so far given you Shs five hundred thousand (Ugx 500,000/=) got from the first SaCCO withdraw and that the remaining balance is to be deducted from the recently approved third withdraw.

As you are aware, this matter of leaders like you and the RDC soliciting for bribes from Emyooga programs has come to the attention of even H.E. the President and during his previous national address, he warned against this vice, promising to punish those involved in it.

You and the RDC have been identified as people promoting corruption in this Emyooga program. I therefore warn you strongly against further engaging in such corrupt tendencies. As you are well aware, this is a crime for which you will be arrested, interdicted, tried, convicted, imprisoned and dismissed from the public service of Uganda with disgrace. I know you are hardworking officers and cadres; please, don't let your careers be ruined over small things.

I passed similar warning yesterday to the signatories of Ndejje Taxi Operators Myooga SaCCO - Mr. Bright Joseph (Chairperson), Ms. Mbabazi Annet (Treasurer) and Mr. Segawa Vicent (Secretary) - advising them against giving you the remaining balance of Shillings five hundred thousand (Ugx 500,000/=), but they remained committed to giving you the money, seemingly afraid of offending you. I warned them that they (the givers / conveyors) and you plus RDC (the recipients) will all be held liable for engaging in corruption.

The same warning has now been passed to you as well. Please, take heed. Don't blame anyone for consequences that may follow if you ignore this caution.

Best regards,

B.B. Bakampa.

After receiving the email, Ms. Nassuuna Doreen summoned our SACCO account signatories to a meeting in the municipal gardens, on Monday, 18th October, 2021, at about 1:00 p.m., the purposes of which were to devise strategies of either co-opting me in their bribery network, or else have me thrown out of the SACCO! Later, at about 2:10 p.m., she also called me to the meeting, intimidatingly questioned me on my role in the SACCO, while cleverly enticing me to endorse their avenues of corruption through inflated office expenses on items like rent in the name of accountability. I rejected their evil scheme and what ensued was execution of their earlier designed mischievous plot to expel me from the SACCO, or at least eliminate me from its leadership, in flagrant abuse of the democratic process!

2.                  Profiteering

Two of our SACCO leaders have excelled at devising schemes of enriching themselves using SACCO money namely, Mr. Bright Joseph (Chairperson) and Ms. Mbabazi Annet (Treasurer). This all-powerful duo has an unholy alliance of making financial arrangements for themselves, which they later ‘throw’ at other leaders to approve or endorse in meetings that are usually called long after the issue at hand has occurred. Without much choice, other leaders pass their schemes, really out of fear of offending them or for the sake of peace, harmony and avoiding quarrels. Below are some examples.

First, Mr. Bright Joseph had stolen shillings one million, two hundred thousand (Shs. 1,200,000/=) from the SACCO soon after making our first withdraw, disguising it as a loan. It was given to him by Ms. Mbabazi Annet, in exchange for giving her money to plaster her room that she would later rent to the SACCO. When this came to our attention, fellow SACCO leaders led by me, condemned and opposed this theft and forced Mr. Bright Joseph to take the money as a loan, for which a file was made for him. He requested some more money and we gave it to him, mainly out of respect for him as our leader, considering his financial needs. Meanwhile, the SACCO had already established itself in Ms. Mbabazi’s unfinished room, without electricity, no cemented floor, etc., at a fee of shillings one hundred thousand (Shs, 100,000/=) per month. We couldn’t save much since money worth four months of rent was already paid out to her without our consent. So, we grudgingly accepted the illicit deal and moved on.

Second, more recently (about early this month), Mr. Bright Joseph and Ms. Mbabazi Annet, struck another deal allowing her to bring her daughter, a young teenage mother, to work in the SACCO as an office administrator, for which the SACCO pays a monthly salary of shillings one hundred and fifty thousand (Shs. 150,000/=). No due process was followed like interviews as was done with the first employee. Knowledge of computer applications was set as a prerequisite for this position since the SACCO will get a computer anytime soon, but from the way I see this young girl, I doubt she can even type a sentence in a computer! The appointment was just announced to us, fellow leaders, on Wednesday, 17th November, 2021, in line with their usual practice of ‘throwing’ things at others. Well, as usual, we ignored the matter since not much could be done without setting off a quarrel and causing bad-blood among us. In exchange, the SACCO was to shift, rent a double room house, occupy the front room and Mr. Bright Joseph occupies the back room! Unfortunately for him, circumstances arose that forced a meeting of leaders before the deal materialized and eventually it couldn’t go throw as planned. The SACCO was slated to lose rent of December and half of November at Ms. Mbabazi’s premises. That’s how absurd the situation is in this SACCO with its present leadership.

Third, these leaders have now hijacked and literally confiscated my property i.e. an office table and its chair that I had lent to the SACCO until it was able to buy its own properties. They have failed to develop the SACCO by getting for it its own items, clearly because they see that there are ‘free’ things available there. The SACCO has not even bought an office rubbish can, as requested by the previous office administrator and which some of us have repeatedly talked about! Our leaders just want to steal money instead of using it for legitimate office work. After deciding to leave the SACCO, having seen that its state of affairs is beyond repair (unless with total overhaul), I demanded to take away my property which the leaders have refused to give to me. I request you and all those copied in this letter to use your good offices and help me recover my property and saving from these sadly greedy and thieving people. For now, I put them in the personal care and responsibility of Ms. Mbabazi Annet, who is our landlady, treasurer and whose daughter is office administrator seated in the office every day.

3.                  Abuse of power

It is already self-evident that our leaders, especially Mr. Bright Joseph (Chairperson) and Ms. Mbabazi Annet (Treasurer) abuse the powers and privileges of their offices for personal benefit – moreover criminally! Yet their abuses do not stop there. In doing this – quite regrettably – they are urged on and supported by the Municipal Commercial Officer, Ms. Nassuuna Doreen! She is so committed to and protective of her corruption network that she insults democracy by misusing elections to keep them in power and charge of SACCOs – her fatty cash cows! Consider, for instance, a recent scenario in our SACCO.

When I could not be co-opted in their bribery network during the meeting of Monday, 18th October, 2021, Ms. Nassuuna Doreen and her corrupt allies embarked on mischievously getting me out of our SACCO’s leadership and membership altogether, through a subverted democratic exercise. After the meeting, she told us that she would come on Friday, 22nd October, 2021, at 2:00 p.m., to conduct fresh elections for all leadership positions from Chairperson to the least one; and this is what we communicated to our colleagues. Soon after, I heard the Chairperson, Mr. Bright Joseph and the Secretary, Mr. Segawa Vicent (both Nassuuna protégés), saying that the Executive Committee (of which they are members) will not be dissolved. Fearing to lose elections, they went back to Ms. Nassuuna and negotiated a soft landing for themselves whereby she would secure them by simply confirming them in their positions.

Indeed, when she came that Friday, at 3:36 p.m., Secretary Segawa, playing to script, said, “I request that we confirm the existing Executive,” to which Ms. Nassuuna immediately agreed, without even putting it to a vote of the meeting, thereby denying members their power of democratic control. When I rose up to question this and remind her that she promised the four of us who met her earlier that all positions were to be contested for, she said that these ones are being confirmed in order to save time! She ruled that we only elect the Loans and Supervisory committees, adding that the Loans Committee (on which I served as Secretary) will be got from “not serious or busy members of the Executive Committee.” Wow! So, why are unserious and dormant people leading others? Moreover, this approach definitely leads to a lame duck and indolent Loans Committee that is merely an appendage of the executive leadership. I advised her that it is better to keep the Loans Committee separate from the Executive Committee for, among other reasons, that it provides sufficient checks in monitoring SACCO money and prevents one group of people from being too powerful so as to oppress loan applicants. But she contemptuously ignored these concerns because the sole purpose of this whole dramatic exercise was to firmly deny me opportunity of even contesting for a position on the Loans Committee, since I was not a member of the Executive Committee.

But there were persistent voices of concern and disapproval from the audience and at this moment, she said that the Loans Committee members will leave the Executive Committee after being elected! Still there were murmurs of discontent and so she called for a vote on the matter (an opportunity she did not give members to choose whether or not to confirm her key corrupt allies on the Executive Committee). Majority were misled into voting in favor of having a Loans Committee that is part and parcel of the Executive Committee. Thereafter, the SACCO Chairperson, Mr. Bright Joseph (a Nassuuna protégé), pinpointed people of his choice to fill newly created positions on the Executive Committee, without even a vote! So, there were created positions of Youth Representative, Women Representative and Disciplinary, who automatically constituted the Loans Committee! I was happy that the latter two were taken by my former colleagues on the Committee because this saves its institutional memory and perhaps safeguards its integrity.

At the end of the day, while I was conspired against and rigged out of membership of the Loans Committee, I was elected overwhelmingly to the Supervisory Committee as its Secretary, which is an even more powerful and influential position since I am now fully empowered to inquire into anything or investigate anybody in the SACCO.

4.                  Incompetence

Ms. Nassuuna Doreen is very incompetent in her work because she does not understand the basic tenets of the Emyooga program. This is very unfortunate because one cannot supervise or superintend over what he or she does not fully appreciate.

One cardinal requirement of the program is that, “A member must have a running enterprise or business,” in order to qualify for a loan. Shockingly, during our SACCO general meeting held on Friday, 22nd October, 2021, Ms. Nassuuna told us that being a taxi driver is a business for which a loan should be given! This was in answer to a question by a member, a taxi driver, whose loan application for a loan the Loans Committee (on which I previously served as secretary) rejected for reasons that he did not have a running business. Right now, all SACCO members take it that merely being a taxi operator is a business in itself, for which they must get loans. This is a wrong and absurd approach that will cause the SACCO to lose money to worthless activities and eventually collapse it altogether.

In my opinion, being a taxi driver or conductor is merely a job, albeit in the taxi industry, but is not a business in itself. This job should be distinguished from being an owner of a taxi; and so on which basis the owner has a running business, able to apply for a loan in order to, for instance, repair or renovate the taxi, or even buy an additional one (but not a luxury car).

Conclusion

The Emyooga program is a noble innovation in the socio-economic welfare of Ugandans and Africans in general. It should be supported and enabled as much as possible. Yet very much of its success depends on credible and reliable personnel of high integrity to implement it. Going forward, therefore, I would make the following proposals:

1.   I would highly recommend the immediate suspension from duty of Mr. Bright Joseph (Chairperson), Ms. Mbabazi Annet (Treasurer) and Mr. Segawa Vicent (Secretary). If they should stay on, they should be subjected to free and fair elections, which the SACCO has never enjoyed, in accordance with members’ democratic control.

2.   I would highly recommend the immediate interdiction and suspension from duty of Ms. Nassuuna Doreen.

3.   I would highly recommend investigation and prosecution of Ms. Nassuuna Doreen, Mr. BrightJoseph, Ms. Mbabazi Annet and Mr. Segawa Vicent for corruption and other crimes.

4.      I would highly recommend an in-depth audit of the SACCO’s books of account.

Lastly, allow me inform you that given all the developments stated above and some others that have been left out for lack of space, nowadays I live in fear for my life, worried that terrible harm could be done to me like pouring acid on me, hiring goons to beat me up, knocking me dead, etc. I have already informed my fellow members in the SACCO of these fears. Pray for me.

Yours faithfully,

 [signed]

Bakampa Brian Baryaguma

Outgoing SACCO Member and Secretary - Supervisory Committee

Mobile:          +256753124713

Email:             bakampasenior@gmail.com

 

 

c.c.:     - Chairperson, Ndejje Division Taxi Operators Myooga SACCO

            - Chairperson, Mirimu L.C. 1 Zone

- O.C., Mirimu Police Post


This letter was duly served on the Town Clerk and SACCO Chairperson, as evidenced by their stamps. The area L.C. I chairperson and O.C., Police Post were also served with copies of the same.

Friday, 29 October 2021

Corruption, Incompetence and Abuse of Power in Emyooga Program of Makindye-Ssabagabo Municipality, Wakiso District

NDEJJE DIVISION TAXI OPERATORS MYOOGA COOPERATIVE SAVINGS AND CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED

LOCATED AT MIRIMU CELL, NDEJJE WARD, NDEJJE DIVISION, MAKINDYE-SSABAGABO MUNICIPALITY, WAKISO DISTRICT, UGANDA.

Thursday, 28th October, 2021.

To:

The Minister of State for Finance, Planning
and Economic Development (Microfinance),

MoFPED, Kampala, Uganda.

Dear Sir,

Re: Corruption, Incompetence and Abuse of Power in Emyooga Program of Makindye-Ssabagabo Municipality, Wakiso District.

"The only necessary thing for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing,” Edmund Burke.

Introduction

Greetings from our SACCO, Ndejje Division Taxi Operators Myooga Cooperative Savings And Credit Society Limited. Thank you for the good work you are doing for our beloved country, Uganda.

I am a member, immediate former Secretary of Loans Committee and current Secretary of Supervisory Committee of the above mentioned SACCO.

Through you, I thank H.E. the President and Cabinet for this wonderful program of Emyooga. As an active member of the SACCO and by virtue of my roles and responsibilities there, I have witnessed first-hand how this program is enabling access to affordable capital by Ugandans and I see that it has great potential to better the fortunes of our people, making them prosperous and advanced, if it is well managed.

The main purpose of this letter is to bring to your attention the fact that the Emyooga program is poorly supervised in Makindye-Ssabagabo Municipality, Wakiso District and consequently its long term effectiveness thoroughly compromised. Information available indicates that the chief culprit is the Municipal Commercial Officer, Ms. Nassuuna Doreen, whose immediate suspension from duty, investigation, prosecution and punishment I would highly recommend, for the reasons stated hereunder.

1. Corruption

Ms. Nassuuna Doreen is known to demand and take bribes from SACCOs through their leaders. For instance, she demanded for Shillings one million (Ugx 1,000,000/=) from our SACCO through the Chairperson, Treasurer and Secretary, who are signatories of the SACCO bank account. She has so far taken shillings five hundred thousand (Ugx 500,000/=) and expects the balance. Evidence of this can be seen in an email I sent to her on this matter, which is attached to this letter for your perusal.

My email to Ms. Nassuuna Doreen cautioning her against soliciting and receiving bribes from SACCOs. 

After receiving the email, Ms. Nassuuna summoned our SACCO account signatories to a meeting in the municipal gardens, on Monday, 18th October, 2021, at about 1:00 p.m., the purposes of which were to devise strategies of either co-opting me in her bribery network, or else have me thrown out of the SACCO. Later, at about 2:10 p.m., she also called me to the meeting, intimidatingly questioned me on my role in the SACCO, while cleverly enticing me to endorse her avenues of corruption through inflated office expenses on items like rent in the name of accountability. I rejected her evil scheme and what ensued was execution of their earlier designed mischievous plot to expel me from the SACCO, or at least eliminate me from its leadership, in flagrant abuse of the democratic process!

2. Incompetence

Ms. Nassuuna Doreen is very incompetent in her work because she does not understand the basic tenets of the Emyooga program. This is very unfortunate because one cannot supervise or superintend over what he or she does not fully appreciate.

One cardinal requirement of the program is that, “A member must have a running enterprise or business,” in order to qualify for a loan. Shockingly, during our SACCO general meeting held on Friday, 22nd October, 2021, Ms. Nassuuna told us that being a taxi driver is a business for which a loan should be given! This was in answer to a question by a member, a taxi driver, whose loan application for a loan the Loans Committee (on which I previously served as secretary) rejected for reasons that he did not have a running business. Right now, all SACCO members take it that merely being a taxi operator is a business in itself, for which they must get loans. This is a wrong and absurd approach that will cause the SACCO to lose money to worthless activities and eventually collapse it altogether. In my opinion, being a driver or conductor is merely a job, albeit in the taxi industry, but is not a business in itself. This job should be distinguished from being an owner of a taxi; and so on which basis the owner has a running business able to apply for a loan in order to, for instance, repair or renovate the taxi, or even buy an additional one (but not a luxury car).

Further, Ms. Nassuuna Doreen is incompetent for not effectively supervising SACCO leaders in her area (Makindye-Ssabagabo Municipality), some of whom use the Emyooga funds for moneylending purposes and other irrelevant uses, hence losing money to illicit activities. But because they are her allies and protégés, giving her bribes, Ms. Nassuuna does not punish or hold them accountable, by for instance, examining their loan documentation and processes.

3. Abuse of Power

It is already self-evident that Ms. Nassuuna Doreen abuses the power and privileges of her office for personal benefit – moreover criminally! Yet her abuses do not stop there. She is so committed to and protective of her corruption network that she insults democracy by misusing elections to keep them in power and charge of SACCOs – her fatty cash cows!

When I could not be co-opted in her bribery network during the meeting of Monday, 18th October, 2021, Ms. Nassuuna and her corrupt allies embarked on mischievously getting me out of our SACCO leadership and membership altogether, through a subverted democratic exercise. After the meeting, she told us that she would come on Friday, 22nd October, 2021, at 2:00 p.m., to conduct fresh elections for all leadership positions from Chairperson to the least one and this is what we communicated to our colleagues. Soon after, I heard the Chairperson, Mr. Bright Joseph and the Secretary, Mr. Segawa Vicent (both Nassuuna protégés), saying that the Executive Committee (of which they are members) will not be dissolved. Fearing to lose elections, they went back to Ms. Nassuuna and negotiated a soft landing for themselves whereby she would secure them by simply confirming them in their positions.

Indeed, when she came that Friday, at 3:36 p.m., Secretary Segawa, playing to script, suggested that, “we confirm the existing Executive,” to which Ms. Nassuuna immediately agreed, without even putting it to a vote of the meeting, thereby denying members their power of democratic control. When I rose up to question this and reminded her that she promised the four of us that all positions were to be contested for, she said that these ones are being confirmed in order to save time! She ruled that we only elect the Loans and Supervisory committees, adding that the Loans Committee (on which I served as Secretary) will be got from “not serious or busy members of the Executive Committee.” Wow! So, why are unserious and dormant people leading others? Moreover, this approach definitely leads to a lame duck and indolent Loans Committee that is merely an appendage of the executive leadership. I advised her that it is better to keep the Loans Committee separate from the Executive Committee for, among others, reasons that it provides sufficient checks in monitoring SACCO money and prevents one group of people from being too powerful so as to oppress loan applicants. But she contemptuously ignored these concerns because the sole purpose of this whole dramatic exercise was to firmly deny me opportunity of even contesting for a position on the Loans Committee, since I was not a member of the executive.

But there were persistent voices of concern and disapproval from the audience and at this moment, she said that the Loans Committee members will leave the Executive Committee after being elected! Still there were murmurs of discontent and so she called for a vote on the matter (an opportunity she did not give members to choose whether or not to confirm her key corrupt allies on the Executive Committee). Majority were misled into voting in favor of having a Loans Committee that is part and parcel of the Executive Committee. Thereafter, the SACCO Chairperson, Mr. Bright Joseph (a Nassuuna protégé), pinpointed people of his choice to fill newly created positions on the Executive Committee, without even a vote! So, there were created positions of Youth Representative, Women Representative and Disciplinary, who automatically constituted the Loans Committee! I was happy that the latter two were taken by my former colleagues on the Committee because this saves its institutional memory and perhaps safeguards its integrity.

At the end of the day, while I was conspired against and rigged out of membership of the Loans Committee, I was elected overwhelmingly to the Supervisory Committee as its Secretary, which is an even more powerful and influential position since I am now fully empowered to inquire into anything or investigate anybody in the SACCO.

Conclusion

The Emyooga program is a noble innovation in the socio-economic welfare of Ugandans and Africans in general. It should be supported and enabled as much as possible. Yet very much of its success depends on credible and reliable personnel of high integrity to implement it.

Ms. Nassuuna Doreen (and others of her ilk) is bad news for the program. For the foregoing reasons, I would, once again, highly recommend her immediate suspension from duty, investigation, prosecution and punishment. She is unworthy of the office of Municipal Commercial Officer, Makindye-Ssabagabo Municipality – and certainly, that office deserves an occupant better than her.

Yours faithfully,

[signed]

Bakampa Brian Baryaguma

SACCO Member and Secretary of Supervisory Committee.

Mobile:  +256753124713

Email:    bakampasenior@gmail.com


c.c.: - Executive Director, Microfinance Support Center

        - Town Clerk, Makindye-Ssabagabo Municipality


My letter was served on the key authorities in the microfinance sector. I hope action will be taken against the culprits. We can defeat corruption in Uganda if we all work together, each one making a contribution in this regard.

Monday, 16 August 2021

How Can a Modern Judiciary Lose a Court File?

By Bakampa Brian Baryaguma

bakampasenior@gmail.com; www.huntedthinker.blogspot.ug

The Judiciary of Uganda says, on its website, that “The Judiciary's Mission is "To Administer Justice to all people in Uganda in an Independent, Impartial, Accountable, Effective and Efficient manner." The website states further that, “The Judiciary's Vision is "An Excellent Judiciary that Delivers Justice for All." All emphases are in the original.

The Logo of Uganda's Judiciary

A combined reading of the Judiciary’s mission and vision reveals that the judicial organ aspires to be (or better still, is) a modern institution of Government that excels at effectiveness and efficiency. No doubt, a noble endeavor. So, when one faces a situation where one’s court file gets lost or is misplaced (nomenclature doesn’t matter here since the effect is materially the same), then one can’t help but wonder and ask how a modern judiciary can lose a court file! This is the situation I am in now; and it arose as follows.

On Friday, 23rd April, 2021, I filed a suit – Miscellaneous Cause No. 129 of 2021, Bakampa Brian Baryaguma v. Attorney Generalin the civil division of the High Court of Uganda, at Kampala. On Friday, 14th May, 2021, I was told that my case had been allocated to Justice Esther Nambayo and was instructed to follow it up with the clerk in her chambers. On that very day, I went to the Judge’s chambers and found there her staff, including a clerk whom I later learnt is called Nakacwa Jennifer (sic). I introduced myself to her, stated my purpose of coming and inquired if she received my case file. She checked on her computer and confirmed that indeed the file was allocated to Justice Nambayo. She said that she hadn’t yet picked the file from the registry, but that she would get it later in the day and contact me as soon as she finds it. In the meantime, she advised me to follow up on the matter in the coming week, via her WhatsApp number (which she gave to me), in case she forgot to get back to me. I thanked her and left. On Tuesday, 1st June, 2021, I went back to court to find out how far my matter was. Ms. Nakacwa showed me my file (it was white in color), but told me that it hadn’t yet been signed by the registrar. So, she promised to have it signed that day and inform me so that I serve the opposite party – the Attorney General. I thanked her, left the chambers and waited for updates. On Wednesday, 2nd June, 2021, I sent her a WhatsApp message inquiring whether the registrar signed the documents on file. She said she wasn’t in chambers and advised me to go to chambers and follow up the matter with her colleague, whom she identified as Evelyn. On or about Thursday, 10th June, 2021, I went back to court, confident that my file was already signed by the registrar, ready for service on Attorney General and for me to get my personal copies. I found Ms. Evelyn in chambers and said to her that Ms. Nakacwa told me to follow up my file with her (Evelyn). To my dismay, Ms. Evelyn looked for the file in all chamber cabinets and drawers but couldn’t find it. Ms. Evelyn advised me to contact Ms. Nakacwa again in order to find out where my case file is. But on that day, I also learnt that all court clerks would be away attending something like a training workshop that would last for about one week. Therefore, I didn’t bother contacting Ms. Nakacwa immediately since I was aware that she wouldn’t be available at work, anyway. Then, soon after that, we went into a 42 days national lockdown due to a surge in Covid-19 infections, which lockdown was lifted on Friday, 30th July, 2021. On Tuesday, 3rd August, 2021, I sent Ms. Nakacwa a WhatsApp message reminding her about my case file, how it was missing before lockdown and requested her to find it so that it may be signed by the registrar, ready for service on the respondent, Attorney General. She didn’t respond to this message. On Thursday, 12th August, 2021, I went to court to check on the progress of my file. I found both ladies, Nakacwa and Evelyn, in chambers. I talked to Ms. Nakacwa, who looked for the file briefly, but couldn’t find it. I informed her that even Ms. Evelyn failed to find it before lockdown. Ms. Nakacwa promised to look for it the next day (Friday) and advised me to check with her via WhatsApp at 10:00 a.m. In the meantime, she fixed my matter for hearing on Tuesday, 11th January, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. The next day (Friday, 13th August, 2021), I sent her a WhatsApp message, at 10:15 a.m., asking whether she found the file. At 10:44 a.m., she responded briefly saying that, “Not yet.”

Hence, as at the time of publishing this write-up, (in the morning of Monday, 16th August, 2021), I take it that for all intents and purposes, my court file is lost, since Ms. Nakacwa has not yet found it. As can be seen therefore, the question, How Can a Modern Judiciary Lose a Court File?, is quite a pertinent one, because losing court files militates against efficiency and effectiveness that our Judiciary aspires to in performing its duties. Nothing can be done without court files. They should be traced and accounted for at all times. For instance, although my matter was fixed for hearing early next year (I was told the first to be entertained by Justice Nambayo when that time comes), I am sure the hearing won’t take place because the file to be processed won’t be available, since a judge cannot conduct a hearing without documents to refer to. In this day and age – the 21st century – of hi-tech information and communication systems, lapses like files getting lost should not be tolerated at all. We must feel embarrassed by such trivialities and make a commitment to eradicate them.

At this pace, I am also worried about my other matter – Miscellaneous Cause No. 428 of 2019, Bakampa Brian Baryaguma v. Law Development Centre – which has been pending ruling before Justice Elubu Michael since Monday, 14th December, 2020, when all the submissions were filed. I ask myself: what if its file is also lost, considering that verdict in the case is long overdue? Moreover, the Judge was even transferred to head another division of the High Court. I know judges, registrars and magistrates in Uganda are overwhelmed by cases and I sympathize with them and the system that administers them. Nevertheless, the concern remains, that if one file can get lost, then another can get lost too; especially when one is up against so mischievous a group of people like those at the Law Development Centre. The Judiciary is their tuff – a home ground – where they are well connected with many friends and loyalists, and so able to do terrible harm that is characteristic of them.

Anyway, back to my current suit – Miscellaneous Cause No. 129 of 2021, Bakampa Brian Baryaguma v. Attorney General: I urge Ms. Nakacwa Jennifer and her colleagues at court to find this file urgently so that its preliminaries proceed normally, pending hearing.

Thursday, 1 October 2020

It is Not a Must to Bury a Muslim Immediately after Dying

By Bakampa Brian Baryaguma

bakampasenior@gmail.com; www.huntedthinker.blogspot.com

Uganda lost a prominent Muslim citizen, Al Hajji Nasser Ntege Ssebagala, on Saturday, 26th September, 2020, at around 10:00 A.M. Al Hajji Ssebagala was a former mayor of Kampala, Uganda’s capital city. May his soul rest in eternal peace.

 

Al Hajji Nasser Ntege Ssebagala, a very devoted Muslim, left a will directing that his body should not be buried, until his children and other close relatives return to Uganda, from around the world, to be present at his burial. Consequently, his family has given those concerned seven days to come back home for the burial, and set Sunday, 4th October, 2020, as the date of burial.

This will and decision has turned out to be controversial, and ignited debate as to whether this is allowed in Islam. In fact, the Supreme Mufti of the Muslim faction at Kibuli, Sheikh Siliman Kasule Ndirangwa, castigated this, and called upon Muslims to make their wills and decisions in accordance with what he calls the law of Allah and the practices of Prophet Muhammad. The common practice among Muslims is that burials should be carried out immediately after death – in any case not later than 24 hours. In this case, the Late Ssebagala should have been buried even on that very day, probably in the evening, or early morning the next day.

Supreme Mufti Sheikh Siliman Kasule Ndirangwa

Dear reader, it is not true that Muslims must be buried immediately, by Islamic law. The alleged law, resulting from common practice among Muslims, is a sheer misunderstanding of the practice and ways of Muhammad. Before you question what right I have to educate Muslims on this, remember that the Koran, in Surah Muhammad 10:94 says that we, people of the Book (i.e. Christians and Jews), should teach Muhammad and his followers where they do not understand Allah’s teachings in the Koran. So, I am only doing my job, and it is important that you seriously pay attention. Now, it is true that Muhammad buried his followers and combatants (swahabas) immediately after death. But this was for two main reasons.

First, Muhammad and his adherents lived in hot desert areas, which did not permit dead bodies to last long before rotting and smelling, and consequently spreading diseases and infections to the living. It was therefore absolutely necessary that the dead be buried soon after dying. Second, in the early days of Islam, Muhammad and his adherents lived and operated in a very hostile environment, characterized by wars, conflicts, and witch-hunt from opponents of the new religion. Muhammad and his team were constantly on the run, fleeing from enemies. So, they held quick burials, since organizing long mourning ceremonies was a luxury they could not afford, due to insecurity and time constraints. It should be noted that these limitations were peculiar to the places from which Islam originated, and therefore do not necessarily apply everywhere else as a matter of law.

For instance, there are cold places where the weather is conducive enough to allow dead bodies to last longer without decomposing. In such places, there is no need for hurried burials. Then, in modern societies, there are improved technologies like refrigeration which help to preserve dead bodies for long, thus allowing delayed burials, in even hot desert areas like the ones Muhammad operated in. And, fortunately for Muslims, Islam is now accepted and not a victimized religion anymore, such that Muslims do not have to rush to bury their dead loved ones in panic. The accommodative environment permits long mourning ceremonies today.

So, the Late Al Hajji Nasser Ntege Ssebagala and his family are justified in choosing to unusually delay the burial of Seya, as Late Ssebagala was fondly called by his political supporters. The Late was, and his family members are aware of the changed and prevailing circumstances today that are fundamentally different from the difficult days of Muhammad and his adherents. I encourage Muslims to emulate them, because they cannot afford to continue living mechanically, as though they were robots, applying a copy-and-paste approach.

Wednesday, 30 September 2020

Bamwenda Tayebwa James: A Beacon of Hope for Makerere at KCCA

 By Bakampa Brian Baryaguma

bakampasenior@gmail.com; www.huntedthinker.blogspot.com

The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines the phrase, beacon of hope, as ‘something that holds the promise of hope.’ This phrase finds true meaning when used in reference to Mr. Bamwenda Tayebwa James, a candidate in the 2021 general elections, standing for the post of LC 5 Councilor (Male) representing Makerere University, at Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA) local government. He was nominated by the Uganda Electoral Commission to stand for this post, on the ticket of Alliance for National Transformation political party. His ambitious manifesto, and commendable past record attest to his suitability for the job.

About Bamwenda Tayebwa James

Mr. Bamwenda is a patriotic Ugandan, family man (married, with two children), social scientist and researcher. He is a true product of Makerere University, which he joined in 2005 as a student, has since attained several academic qualifications from there (including a bachelors and is currently pursuing a masters degree), and now works in the University’s library department.

Aspirations for Makerere University at City Hall

Mr. Bamwenda Tayebwa James has big aspirations and plans for Makerere University and the greater Kampala metropolitan area, as a politician sitting at City Hall, the headquarters of Kampala Capital City Authority. He is aware that his cardinal roles as a Lord Councilor (this is how LC 5 Councilors in Kampala are fondly called) are representation, legislation, budgeting, oversight, and lobbying. Mr. Bamwenda says that he intends to perform these roles pragmatically, with focus, and dedication, in sync with the realities of the Makerere community, in order to achieve his vision, for the well-being of his people.

It is an understatement to say that Mr. Bamwenda Tayebwa James has a good manifesto – his is rich and impressive, thanks to his astounding academic qualifications, sharp political acumen, and robust presence on ground with the electorate. His plan of action revolves around three main policy objectives:

1.                  Bolstering KCCA legal regime, policy framework, and development agenda.

Mr. Bamwenda Tayebwa James hopes to contribute to the formulation of by-laws / ordinances, and shaping policy positions that aim at realizing the ideals and development agenda of KCCA.

2.                  Making Makerere University a model for Kampala metropolitan area.

Mr. Bamwenda Tayebwa James wants to turn Makerere University into a model for the rest of the Kampala metropolitan area, by streamlining development of all infrastructures within the University. He hopes to achieve this by:

(i)               paving university roads, with the help of engineering students and lecturers;

(ii)          improving security in the university premises by increasing personnel, providing street lighting, installing surveillance cameras, and regulating public access to the University;

(iii)   ensuring efficient and effective garbage and sewage management in the University, and transferring the attendant costs to KCCA that has better expertise in this area; and

(iv)      improving health standards by ensuring that the University Hospital is refurbished, well equipped, and adequately staffed, to make it fully functional.

3.                  Transforming Makerere University into a bastion for capacity building.

Mr. Bamwenda Tayebwa James wants to:

(i)          establish a talent hub at Makerere University to identify and harness students’ full potential in various disciplines like sports, arts, communications, business, innovations, etc, which skills can be linked to line industries, and developed into profitable businesses;

(ii)     develop a cottage industry by establishing a special project aimed at equipping children of members of support staff with hands-on skills like tailoring, crafts making, farming, hair dressing, among others. He is very passionate about this group;

(iii)          lobby for jobs and internship placements for students, in reputable organizations;

(iv)          outsource soft loans for staff members, at little or no interest rates; and

(v)          promote an outreach program for Makerereans to engage in community and self-help activities, to nurture patriotism, national pride, and social responsibility.

Conclusion

Mr. Bamwenda Tayebwa James is certainly a good candidate that is worthy to be elected for LC 5 Councilor (Male) representing Makerere University, at Kampala Capital City Authority. I said earlier that he has a commendable past record; and speaking for myself, I thank him for his high sense of justice, without exhibiting personal or selfish interests. His selflessness for the sake of universal fairness is well established.

I know this for sure because I worked with him (from beginning to end) on our impassioned cause for fighting against the cruelty, oppression, tyranny, and underperformance of the Law Development Centre (LDC), whereby that institution had excelled at deliberately failing students in examinations. Although Mr. Bamwenda is not a lawyer, he volunteered his time, money, and energy, towards championing this cause in and outside parliament. And thanks to his efforts and contribution, LDC is now a better place for lawyers. I would encourage all Makerereans to vote for him, especially members of the law fraternity. Bamwenda for Makerere!

Featured Post

Insights into Power Markets and Infrastructure Security in Africa

By Bakampa Brian Baryaguma Kampala, Uganda. Email: bakampasenior@gmail.com . June 2025. ________________________________________________...

Most Popular